Augment Code Alternatives: 20 AI Code Review Tools Compared
6 min read
Updated
A comprehensive, neutral guide to 20 alternatives to Augment Code, covering features, pricing, pros, and use cases for AI-powered code review.
Overview
Augment Code is a coding assistant that leverages a team’s knowledge—code, documentation, and dependencies—through chat, completions, and suggested edits. If you’re evaluating other AI-powered code-review tools, this guide summarizes 20 notable options, organized by popularity and feature set.
Top Alternatives
1. GitHub Copilot
Category: code-review
- Integration: Deeply integrated with GitHub and VS Code.
- Key capabilities: Autocomplete, code generation, bug-fix suggestions, pull-request assistance, and agent-workflow support.
- Pricing: Pro plan (paid) – details on GitHub pricing page.
- Pros: Strong ecosystem, familiar UI for GitHub users.
- Cons: Requires a GitHub subscription for full features.
2. Gemini Code Assist
Category: code-review
- Provider: Google.
- Key capabilities: IDE assistance, enterprise workflow support in Google Cloud, built on Gemini models.
- Pricing: Free tier; paid plans available.
- Pros: Tight integration with Google Cloud services.
- Cons: Limited to supported IDEs.
3. Cline
Category: code-review
- Key capabilities: Autonomous multi-step coding tasks, file creation/editing with human approval, terminal command execution, browser automation, Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration.
- Pricing: Free (requires API key).
- Pros: Powerful automation for complex development workflows.
- Cons: Requires API key; may have a learning curve.
4. Cody
Category: code-review
- Provider: Sourcegraph.
- Key capabilities: Code-graph context, enterprise-level workflows, chat and autocomplete, precise code search.
- Pricing: Free tier; paid plans starting at $9 / mo.
- Pros: Excellent for large repositories with detailed context.
- Cons: Best suited for enterprise environments.
5. Kilo Code
Category: code-review
- Key capabilities: Supports 500+ AI models (Claude, GPT, Gemini), orchestrator mode for coordinated subtasks, open-source under Apache-2.0, works in VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, and Slack.
- Pricing: Free + BYO API key; “Kilo Pass” credits start at $19 / mo.
- Pros: Broad model selection and transparent open-source code.
- Cons: Requires managing API keys for model access.
6. Zhipu AI GLM Coding Plan
Category: code-review
- Key capabilities: Dedicated GLM-4.7 model for code generation, debugging, refactoring; integrates with Cursor, Continue.dev, and Cline via OpenAI-compatible API.
- Pricing: Freemium; paid tier starts at $3 / mo.
- Pros: Very affordable entry point with high token context (200K).
- Cons: Model is specific to Zhipu AI ecosystem.
7. Snyk Code
Category: code-review
- Key capabilities: Real-time static application security testing (SAST) in IDE, auto-fix suggestions (~80% accuracy), data-flow and taint analysis across 19+ languages, up to 50× faster than legacy SAST tools.
- Pricing: Free tier (100 tests/month); Team plan $25 / dev / mo; Enterprise custom.
- Pros: Strong security focus with developer-first UI.
- Cons: Primarily a security scanner rather than a full-featured coding assistant.
8. Pieces
Category: code-review
- Key capabilities: AI-powered snippet manager, offline capabilities, code explanation, screenshot-to-code conversion.
- Pricing: Free & paid versions.
- Pros: Useful for organizing and reusing code snippets.
- Cons: Limited to snippet management; not a full-scale coding assistant.
9. Qodo
Category: code-review
- Key capabilities: Emphasis on code quality, reviews, testing, and improvement.
- Pricing: Paid plans (details on vendor site).
- Pros: Quality-first approach for robust code output.
- Cons: Less feature-rich than some competitors.
10. Sourcery AI
Category: code-review
- Key capabilities: Automated PR reviews, real-time IDE feedback, vulnerability scanning, 200+ built-in Python rules, custom rule support via
.sourcery.yaml. - Pricing: Free (open source); Pro $12 / seat / mo; Team $24 / seat / mo.
- Pros: Strong Python focus with extensive rule set.
- Cons: Primarily Python-centric.
Additional Notable Tools
11. Cursor
Category: IDE agents
- Key capabilities: AI-native VS Code fork, multi-file editing with Composer, Agent mode for autonomous coding, up to 8 parallel agents, background agents, Bugbot PR autofix, MCP plugins.
- Pricing: Free; paid plans from $20 / mo.
12. Bolt.new
Category: app-builders
- Key capabilities: Browser-based full-stack app builder, natural-language prompts to generate applications, Supabase integration, Figma/GitHub imports, one-click deployment.
- Pricing: Free tier; paid Pro/Team subscriptions.
13. Lovable
Category: app-builders
- Key capabilities: Prompt-first full-stack generation (React/TS/Tailwind), Lovable Cloud backend with auth & data persistence, real-time collaboration (up to 20 users), agentic multi-step edits, AI connectors (Perplexity, ElevenLabs, etc.).
- Pricing: Free; paid plans from $20 / mo.
14. Google AntiGravity
Category: IDE agents
- Key capabilities: Four product surfaces—IDE (VS Code fork), standalone desktop (AntiGravity 2.0), Go-based CLI, Python SDK. Offers a unified agentic development platform.
- Pricing: Free tier; AI Pro $20 / mo; Ultra tiers available.
15. v0
Category: app-builders
- Key capabilities: AI-driven design-to-code, UI-first generation, Figma imports, element-level editing.
- Pricing: Free; Pro & Enterprise plans.
16. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Category: IDE agents
- Key capabilities: Local AI editor with Agent Command Center, parallel workspaces (Spaces), ACP support for remote agents, SWE-1.6 proprietary model.
- Pricing: Free; Pro $20 / mo; Max $200 / mo.
17. Replit
Category: cloud platforms
- Key capabilities: Browser-based IDE, built-in deployment, collaboration, Replit AI (Ghostwriter) for generation, explanation, and autonomous agents.
- Pricing: Free; paid plans from $25 / mo.
18. Claude Code
Category: IDE agents
- Provider: Anthropic.
- Key capabilities: Natural-language prompt → plan → code generation & editing, visual diffs, Cowork background agents, cloud sandbox with GitHub repo cloning.
- Pricing: Free tier (limited).
19. Claude Code CLI
Category: IDE agents
- Key capabilities: Terminal-based agentic coding, full codebase access, autonomous file edits, command execution, Git workflow integration, remote channels (Telegram/Discord), scheduling. Requires Claude Pro/Max/Team.
20. GitHub Copilot Workspace
Category: IDE agents
- Key capabilities: Web-based workspace with natural-language task description, plan generation, code changes, one-click PR creation, integrated terminal, port forwarding, repair agent.
- Pricing: Copilot Pro $10 / mo; Pro+ $39 / mo; Business/Enterprise custom.
How to Choose the Right Tool
| Criteria | Recommended Picks |
|---|---|
| Deep IDE integration | GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code CLI |
| Enterprise security & compliance | Snyk Code, Sourcery AI, Cody |
| Multi-model flexibility | Kilo Code, Gemini Code Assist |
| Low-cost / budget-friendly | Zhipu AI GLM Coding Plan, Claude Code (free tier) |
| Full-stack app generation | Bolt.new, Lovable, v0 |
| Agentic autonomous workflows | Cline, Google AntiGravity, Claude Code, Claude Code CLI |
Consider the size of your codebase, required integrations (e.g., GitHub, Google Cloud), security needs, and budget when narrowing down options.
Quick Start Checklist
- Identify core needs – code completion, PR assistance, security scanning, or full-stack generation.
- Match category – select tools from the relevant section above.
- Test free tiers – most alternatives offer free tiers for evaluation.
- Compare pricing – factor in per-developer costs versus feature depth.
- Check ecosystem fit – ensure the tool works with your preferred IDE, CI/CD pipeline, and code repository host.
By reviewing the features, pricing, and use-case fit outlined here, you can select an AI-powered code-review solution that aligns with your development workflow and budget.